GMAT思为大家整理了GMAT写作5.5分:ARGUMENT写作模板,供考生们参考,以下是详细内容。
总模板:
In this argument, the author concludes that To support his conclusion, the author points out that. In addition, the author reasons that Further more, he also assumes that . At first glance, the authors argument appears to be somehow appealing, while a close examination will reveal how groundless it is. We do not have to look very far to see the invalidity of this argument. This argument is problematic for the following reasons.
In the first place, this argument rests on a gratuitous assumption that . However, the assumption is questionable because the author provides no evidence to support this argument. The arguer fails to take into account other facts that might contribute to the result that .. It is likely that , ..; it is also likely that Any of these scenarios, if true, would show that Therefore, this argument in question nee not to be accepted without ruling out such possibility.
In the second place, the argument commits a logic fallacy of after this and therefore because of this. In no case can the mere fact that be cited as evidence to support the assumption that there is a causal-effect relationship between A and B. Moreover, that just because B can be statistically correlated with A doesnot necessarily mean that A is the cause of B. In fact, the author has obviously neglected the possibility of other alternative facts such as, or may contribute to a certain extent to B. It may be only a coincidence that . Unless the author can rule out other factors relevant to , this assumption in question can not be accepted.
In the third place, the evidence that the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is rarely sufficient to establisha general conclusion. Unless the arguer can show that A1 is representative of all A, the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted. In fact, in face of such limited evidence, it is fallacious to draw any conclusion at all.
In the fourth place, the argument has also committed a false analogy fallacy. The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects, and the author assumes without justification that all things are equal, and that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. No evidence is provided to support this assumption. However there are all kinds of important differences between . and other making the analogy highly less than valid. For example, A..., however, B....Thus lacking this assumption, the conclusion that is entirely unfounded.
Last but no least, the validity of the survey on which the argument relies is doubtful in itself. The survey cited by the author is too vague to be informative.
The claim does not indicate who conducted this survey and when and how the survey is conducted, neither does it mention what is the sample size, or how the samples are selected. Until these questions are answered the results of this survey are worthless as evidence to support that.
Besides, the author assumes that A and B are mutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground. However, the author has never offered any reasons or evidences for imposing an either-or choice. Common sense and observation tells us that adjoining both A and B might produce better results.
普通的结尾
In conclusion, the arguer fails to substantiate his claim that . Because the evidence cited in the analysis is too weak to lend strong support to what the arguer claims. To strengthen the argument, the arguer must convince us that. In addition, the arguer could have to provide more precise information to support his claim.
建议文章的结尾:
In conclusion, it is imprudent for to solely on the basis of the evidence presented. Because the evidence cited in the analysis is too weak to lend strong support to what the arguer claims. To make the argument more convincing, the arguer should provide more substantial evidence concerning thatMoreover, I would suspend my judgment about the credibility of the recommendation untilthe arguer could provide all concrete evidence to rule out all the above possibilities that I analyzed.
调研文章的结尾:
In conclusion, the survey on which the argument relies lacks credibility and therefore does not lend strong support to the conclusion thatTo strengthen the argument, the arguer must convince us that. Moreover, I would suspend my judgment about the credibility of the recommendation until the arguer could provide all concrete evidence to rule out all the above possibilities that I analyzed.
以上就是GMAT写作5.5分:ARGUMENT写作模板的详细内容,考生可针对文中介绍的方法进行有针对性的备考。最后,GMAT预祝大家在GMAT考试中取得好成绩!
上一篇: GMAT满分作文独家炼制秘方分享
下一篇: GMAT写作如何应用公理
体坛英语资讯:Justine Siegal Makes Major League Baseball History
万圣节之你敢召唤血腥玛丽吗?
体坛英语资讯:Fabregas to miss one or two games for hamstring injury
你能分清wear & put on & dress吗?
体坛英语资讯:Corinthians beat Linense 2-0 in Brazilian soccer championship
体坛英语资讯:Adriano leaves for Italy under pressure
体坛英语资讯:AC Milan pull away with win over Napoli
7步帮你克服对失败的恐惧
体坛英语资讯:Ancelotti denies Roma rumors
体坛英语资讯:Julio Baptista to undergo knee surgery in Brazil
体坛英语资讯:Olympic skating medalist Bos retires
especially 与specially的区别
体坛英语资讯:Evra to stay at Old Trafford until 2014
have用法总结
体坛英语资讯:Top two win in Spains La Liga
体坛英语资讯:New Jersey Nets win 1st NBA regular season game in Europe
体坛英语资讯:Barcelona wins against Athletic Club to remain five clear
体坛英语资讯:Real Madrid, Barcelona both win in Spains matchday 26
体坛英语资讯:Fabregas to miss League Cup final
跟book有关的习语
与Think有关的短语用法
你能分清can 与 may吗?
牛津词典也出错 这些短语不是莎士比亚发明的
enquire 与inquire的区别
体坛英语资讯:Chelsea fight back to see off Manchester United 2-1
体坛英语资讯:Heikkinen wins first gold for Finland at skiing worlds
away与off的区别
体坛英语资讯:West Ham sink Liverpool 3-1
体坛英语资讯:Cuban hurdler Dayron Robles desires to meet U.S. rival Oliver
体坛英语资讯:Pele criticises money-oriented football career