22. The conclusion in this argument is that increased vigilance by drug enforcement
authorities has resulted in an increase in the illegal use of cocaine. The author reaches
this conclusion on the grounds that drug traffickers have responded to increased
enforcement efforts by switching from bulkier and riskier drugs to cocaine. Presumably,
the authors reasoning is that the increased enforcement efforts inadvertently brought
about an increase in the supply of cocaine which, in turn, brought about the observed
increase in the illegal use of cocaine. This line of reasoning is problematic in two
important respects.
In the first place, the author has engaged in after this, therefore because of this
reasoning. The only reason offered for believing that the increased vigilance caused the
increase in cocaine use is the fact that the former preceded the latter. No additional
evidence linking the two events is offered in the argument, thus leaving open the
possibility that the two events are not causally related but merely correlated. This in turn
leaves open the possibility that factors other than the one cited are responsible for the
increase in cocaine use.
In the second place, the author assumes that an increase in the supply of cocaine is
sufficient to bring about an increase in its use. While this is a tempting assumption, it is
a problematic one. The presumption required to substantiate this view is that drug users
are not particular about which drugs they use, so that if marijuana and heroin are not
available, they will switch to whatever drug is available―cocaine in this case. The
assumption does not seem reasonable on its face. Marijuana, heroin, and cocaine are not
alike in their effects on users; nor are they alike in the manner in which they are
ingested or in their addictive properties. The view that drug users choice of drugs is
simply a function of supply overlooks these important differences.
In conclusion, the author has failed to establish a causal link between increased
enforcement efforts and the observed increase in illegal cocaine use. While the
enforcement activities may have been a contributing factor, to show a clear causal
connection the author must examine and rule out various other factors.
下一篇: GMAT考试写作例文224篇连载(四五)
人类会自己毁灭地球吗?
国际英语资讯:Italy enters new phase after lockdown, as coronavirus claims over 29,000 lives
国内英语资讯:Epidemic fight boosts national pride among young Chinese: survey
中学生为何不读名著?
合理运用惩罚
名著“必读”还是“选读”
国际英语资讯:Turkey reports 1,670 new COVID-19 cases, totaling 126,045
人类会自己毁灭地球
国内英语资讯:China sees sharp increase of registered import, export enterprises in March
国内英语资讯:False U.S. accusations against China expose its own human rights problems: Peoples Daily c
中学生出国留学弊大于利
国际英语资讯:Israels daily new COVID-19 cases drop to 23, lowest since March 15
体坛英语资讯:Chinese shuttlers miss title for 1st time since 1996 at All England Open
中学生该不该看武侠小说
讲刑法的罗翔教授火出了圈,“法外狂徒张三”刷屏B站
体坛英语资讯:Chinas national shooting team boosts endurance, will power through hiking program
国内英语资讯:Xi Focus: Xi extends greetings to young Chinese ahead of Youth Day
国际英语资讯:Indian PM holds key meeting to spur economic growth
中学生打工利弊谈
国际英语资讯:China donates medical supplies to Fiji to help fight COVID-19
中学生打工利弊谈
国际英语资讯:Feature: Public hospital in Istanbul achieves success in fighting COVID-19
中学生打工利弊谈
谈中学生出国留学之利与弊
国内英语资讯:Nominal income of Chinas impoverished rural residents rises
国际英语资讯:Over 46,000 arrested in Sri Lanka for violating curfew
国际英语资讯:S. African govt sets out strict measures for workplaces
人类会毁灭地球吗?
中学生打工利弊谈
国内英语资讯:Commentary: Bannon, a bane to global pandemic fight