GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范文七九-查字典英语网
搜索1
所在位置: 查字典英语网 >留学英语 > GMAT > GMAT写作 > GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范文七九

GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范文七九

发布时间:2016-03-02  编辑:查字典英语网小编

  11. The recommendation endorsed in this argument is that residents of San Perdito

  vote current mayor Montoya out of office, and re-elect former mayor Varro. The reasons

  cited are that during Montoyas four years in office the population has decreased while

  unemployment has increased, whereas during Varros term unemployment declined

  while the population grew. This argument involves the sort of gross oversimplification

  and emotional appeal typical of political rhetoric; for this reason it is unconvincing.

  First of all, the author assumes that the Montoya administration caused the

  unemployment in San Perdito as well as its population loss. The line of reasoning is that

  because Montoya was elected before the rise in unemployment and the decline in

  population, the former event caused the latter. But this is fallacious reasoning unless

  other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example,

  perhaps a statewide or nationwide recession is the cause of these events. Or perhaps the

  current economic downturn is part of a larger picture of economic cycles and trends,

  and has nothing to do with who happens to be mayor. Yet another possibility is that

  Varro enjoyed a period of economic stability and Varros own administration set the

  stage for the unemployment and the decline in population the city is now experiencing

  under Montoya.

  Secondly, job availability and the economic health of ones community are issues

  that affect people emotionally. The argument at hand might have been intentionally

  oversimplified for the specific purpose of angering citizens of San Perdito, and thereby

  turning them against the incumbent mayor. Arguments that bypass relevant, complex

  reasoning in favor of stirring up emotions do nothing to establish their conclusions; they

  are also unfair to the parties involved.

  In conclusion, I would not cast my vote for Varro on the basis of this weak

  argument. The author must provide support for the assumption that Mayor Montoya has

  caused San Perditos poor economy. Moreover, such support would have to involve

  examining and eliminating other possible causal factors. Only with more convincing

  evidence could this argument become more than just an emotional appeal.

  

  

点击显示

推荐文章
猜你喜欢
附近的人在看
推荐阅读
拓展阅读
  • 大家都在看
  • 小编推荐
  • 猜你喜欢
  •