第一宗罪:无因果联系
The author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification. The line of the reasoning is that because A occurred before B, the former event is responsible for the latter. But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps C is the cause of these events or perhaps B is caused by D.
第二宗罪 样本不足
The evidence the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is logically unsounded to establish a general conclusion , unless it can be shown that A1 is representative of all A. It is possible that.... In fact, in face of such limited evidence, the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted.
第三宗罪: 错误类比
The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects. This assumption is weak, since although there are points of comparison between A and B, there is much dissimilarity as well. For example, A..., however, B.... Thus, it is likely much more difficult for B to do....
第四宗罪 时地全等
The author commits the fallacy of all things are equal. The fact that happened two years ago is not a sound evidence to draw a conclusion that.... The author assumes without justification that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. However, it is not clear in this argument whether the current conditions at AA are the same as they used to be two years ago. Thus it is impossible to conclude that....
第五宗罪 二者择一
The author assumes that AA and BB are mutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground. However, the author provides no reason for imposing an either-or choice. Common sense tells us that adjusting both AA and BB might produce better results.
第六宗罪 可疑调查
The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who conducted the poll, who responded, or when, where and how the poll was conducted. Until these questions are answered, the results of the survey are worthless as evidence for the conclusion.
第七宗罪 结论无据
The author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that.... However, no evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption. In fact, this is not necessarily the case. For example, it is more likely that.... Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility
上一篇: GMAT新黄金80题及范文(十)
2014届最新高考英语一轮单元复习 精品阅读理解提升文章精选一百篇(1)
2014届最新高考英语一轮单元复习 精品阅读理解提升文章精选一百篇(39)
2014届最新高考英语一轮单元复习 精品阅读理解提升文章精选一百篇(14)
2014届最新高考英语一轮单元复习 精品阅读理解提升文章精选一百篇(37)
【三维设计】2017届高三英语二轮复习(通用版)课时跟踪检测:第二卷增分专练(4)(含解析)
2014届最新高考英语一轮单元复习 精品阅读理解提升文章精选一百篇(59)
2014届最新高考英语一轮单元复习 精品阅读理解提升文章精选一百篇(54)
2014届最新高考英语一轮单元复习 精品阅读理解提升文章精选一百篇(53)
2016世界小姐结果出炉 波多黎各美女夺冠
换一个角度 Change the Point of View
【三维设计】2017届高考英语晨读背诵二轮复习天天挤时背:30
2014届最新高考英语一轮单元复习 精品阅读理解提升文章精选一百篇(33)
2016年12个重大科学时刻
2014届最新高考英语一轮单元复习 精品阅读理解提升文章精选一百篇(49)
2014届最新高考英语一轮单元复习 精品阅读理解提升文章精选一百篇(36)
四川省达州市2017届高三第一次诊断测试英语试卷(有答案)
2014届最新高考英语一轮单元复习 精品阅读理解提升文章精选一百篇(43)
【三维设计】2017届高考英语晨读背诵二轮复习天天挤时背:27
【三维设计】2017届高三英语二轮复习(通用版)课时跟踪检测:第二卷增分专练(6)(含解析)
【三维设计】2017届高三英语二轮复习(通用版)课时跟踪检测:第二卷增分专练(8)(含解析)
【三维设计】2017届高三英语二轮复习(通用版)课时跟踪检测:第二卷增分专练(5)(含解析)
2014届最新高考英语一轮单元复习 精品阅读理解提升文章精选一百篇(57)
2014届最新高考英语一轮单元复习 精品阅读理解提升文章精选一百篇(46)
2014届最新高考英语一轮单元复习 精品阅读理解提升文章精选一百篇(35)
【三维设计】2017届高考英语晨读背诵二轮复习天天挤时背:29
福建省泉州市2014高考英语文章突破一轮训练(24)及答案
2014届最新高考英语一轮单元复习 精品阅读理解提升文章精选一百篇(56)
2014届最新高考英语一轮单元复习 精品阅读理解提升文章精选一百篇(58)
印度小学让家长用种树代替交学费
2014届最新高考英语一轮单元复习 精品阅读理解提升文章精选一百篇(40)