警惕GMAT写作七宗罪
第一宗罪:无因果联系
The author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification. The line of the reasoning is that because A occurred before B, the former event is responsible for the latter. But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps C is the cause of these events or perhaps B is caused by D.
第二宗罪 样本不足
The evidence the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is logically unsounded to establish a general conclusion , unless it can be shown that A1 is representative of all A. It is possible that.... In fact, in face of such limited evidence, the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted.
第三宗罪: 错误类比
The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects. This assumption is weak, since although there are points of comparison between A and B, there is much dissimilarity as well. For example, A..., however, B.... Thus, it is likely much more difficult for B to do....
第四宗罪 时地全等
The author commits the fallacy of all things are equal. The fact that happened two years ago is not a sound evidence to draw a conclusion that.... The author assumes without justification that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. However, it is not clear in this argument whether the current conditions at AA are the same as they used to be two years ago. Thus it is impossible to conclude that....
第五宗罪 二者择一
The author assumes that AA and BB are mutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground. However, the author provides no reason for imposing an either-or choice. Common sense tells us that adjusting both AA and BB might produce better results.
第六宗罪 可疑调查
The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who conducted the poll, who responded, or when, where and how the poll was conducted. Until these questions are answered, the results of the survey are worthless as evidence for the conclusion.
第七宗罪 结论无据
The author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that.... However, no evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption. In fact, this is not necessarily the case. For example, it is more likely that.... Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility
上一篇: GMAT考试写作参考例文(43)
下一篇: GMAT作文精品模板推荐(2)
《美女与野兽》玩偶遭吐槽 艾玛•沃森竟成女版贾斯汀•比伯
2016年浙江省杭州市外国语学校高考英语(阅读理解提分训练)每日一练42
2016年高考英语总复习:1-1《School life》课件(牛津译林版)
2016年浙江省杭州市外国语学校高考英语(阅读理解提分训练)每日一练11
2016年浙江省杭州市外国语学校高考英语(阅读理解提分训练)每日一练10
为什么越来越多的人嫌弃并剪掉衣服商标
2016年浙江省杭州市外国语学校高考英语(阅读理解提分训练)每日一练19
2016年浙江省杭州市外国语学校高考英语(阅读理解提分训练)每日一练38
2016年浙江省杭州市外国语学校高考英语(阅读理解提分训练)每日一练13
有关do的习语和表达
2016高考英语二轮复习(完形填空)30分钟限时训练(2)
2016年浙江省杭州市外国语学校高考英语(阅读理解提分训练)每日一练15
2016年浙江省杭州市外国语学校高考英语(阅读理解提分训练)每日一练31
2016年浙江省杭州市外国语学校高考英语(阅读理解提分训练)每日一练07
2016年浙江省杭州市外国语学校高考英语(阅读理解提分训练)每日一练09
2016年浙江省杭州市外国语学校高考英语(阅读理解提分训练)每日一练25
2016年浙江省杭州市外国语学校高考英语(阅读理解提分训练)每日一练08
2016年浙江省杭州市外国语学校高考英语(阅读理解提分训练)每日一练27
2016年浙江省杭州市外国语学校高考英语(阅读理解提分训练)每日一练17
2016年浙江省杭州市外国语学校高考英语(阅读理解提分训练)每日一练49
2016年浙江省杭州市外国语学校高考英语(阅读理解提分训练)每日一练14
2016年浙江省杭州市外国语学校高考英语(阅读理解提分训练)每日一练29
2016年浙江省杭州市外国语学校高考英语(阅读理解提分训练)每日一练46
2016高考英语二轮复习(完形填空)30分钟限时训练(3)
2016高考英语二轮复习(单项选择)25分钟限时训练(5)
2016年浙江省杭州市外国语学校高考英语(阅读理解提分训练)每日一练40
2016年浙江省杭州市外国语学校高考英语(阅读理解提分训练)每日一练43
2016年浙江省杭州市外国语学校高考英语(阅读理解提分训练)每日一练20
2016年浙江省杭州市外国语学校高考英语(阅读理解提分训练)每日一练09
2016年浙江省杭州市外国语学校高考英语(阅读理解提分训练)每日一练32