GMAT考试写作参考例文
Corporations and other businesses should try to eliminate the many ranks and salary grades that classify employees according to their experience and expertise. A flat organizational structure is more likely to encourage collegiality and cooperation among employees.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
Which is a better way to classify and reward employees of a business: a flat organizational structure or a hierarchical structure? The speaker prefers a flat structure in which distinctions between employees based on education or experience are not used as a basis for monetary rewards. I strongly disagree with the speakers view, for two reasons.
In the first place, the speakers preference for a flat structure is based upon the claim that cooperation and collegiality among employees is more likely under this system than under a hierarchical one. However, this claim ignores our everyday experience in human interaction. Disagreements among coworkers are inevitable. Without a clear authoritative figure to resolve them and to make final decisions, disputes are more likely to go unresolved and even worsen, thereby undermining cooperation, congeniality and, ultimately, productivity and profit.
In the second place, whether or not collegiality and cooperation are best fostered by a flat organizational structure is beside the point . My main reason for rejecting an organizational structure that does not distinguish workers in terms of their abilities or experience is that under such a system workers have little incentive to improve their skills, accomplish their work-related goals, or assume responsibility for the completion of their assigned tasks. In my experience, human motivation is such that without enticements such as money, status or recognition, few people would accomplish anything of value or assume responsibility for any task. A flat system actually might provide a distinct disincentive for productivity and efficiency insofar as workers are not held accountable for the quality or quantity of their work. By ignoring human nature, then, a company may be harming itself by encouraging laziness and complacency.
In sum, the speakers opinion that a flat organizational structure is the best way to promote collegiality and cooperation among employees runs counter to the common sense about how people act in a work environment, and in any case provides a feeble rationale for the preference of one organizational structure over another.
上一篇: GMAT考试写作参考例文(23)
下一篇: GMAT考试写作参考例文(11)
2016高考英语(人教版)一轮题库:Book 7 Unit 3《Under the sea》
(重庆大学版)2016届高考英语一轮复习:考点规范练10
(重庆大学版)2016届高考英语一轮复习:考点规范练24
(重庆大学版)2016届高考英语一轮复习:考点规范练19
2016高考英语(人教版)一轮题库:Book 2 Unit 5《Music》
(重庆大学版)2016届高考英语一轮复习:考点规范练18
2016高考英语(人教版)一轮题库:Book 6 Unit 3《A healthy life》
(重庆大学版)2016届高考英语一轮复习:考点规范练22
2016高考英语(人教版)一轮题库:Book 1 Unit 5《Nelson Mandela—a modern hero》
2016高考英语(人教版)一轮题库:Book 4 Unit 2《Working the land》
(重庆大学版)2016届高考英语一轮复习:考点规范练5
2016高考英语(人教版)一轮题库:Book 5 Unit 4《Making the news》
2016高考英语(人教版)一轮题库:Book 3 Unit 3《The Million Pound Bank Note》
2016高考英语(人教版)一轮题库:Book 6 Unit 4《Global warming》
(重庆大学版)2016届高考英语一轮复习:考点规范练21
2016高考英语(人教版)一轮题库:Book 3 Unit 1《Festivals around the world》
2016高考英语(人教版)一轮题库:Book 4 Unit 1《Women of achievement》
2016高考英语(人教版)一轮题库:Book 5 Unit 5《First aid》
(重庆大学版)2016届高考英语一轮复习:考点规范练14
2016高考英语(人教版)一轮题库:Book 6 Unit 2《Poems》
2016高考英语(人教版)一轮题库:Book 6 Unit 5《The power of nature》
2016高考英语(人教版)一轮题库:Book 3 Unit 4《Astronomy:the science of the stars》
2016高考英语(人教版)一轮题库:Book 5 Unit 2《The United Kingdom》
(重庆大学版)2016届高考英语一轮复习:考点规范练23
(重庆大学版)2016届高考英语一轮复习:考点规范练20
科学家发现用微波炉确实能泡出最好喝的茶
2016高考英语(人教版)一轮题库:Book 5 Unit 3《Life in the future》
(重庆大学版)2016届高考英语一轮复习:考点规范练8
(重庆大学版)2016届高考英语一轮复习:考点规范练6
2016高考英语(人教版)一轮题库:Book 2 Unit 1《Cultural relics》