Clearly, government has a responsibility to support the arts. However, if that support is going to produce anything of value, government must place no restrictions on the art that is produced.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above? Develop your position by giving specific reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
The speaker argues that government must support the arts but at the same time impose no control over what art is produced. The implicit rationale for government intervention in the arts is that, without it, cultural decline and erosion of our social fabric will result. However, I find no empirical evidence to support this argument, which in any event is unconvincing in light of more persuasive arguments that government should play no part in either supporting or restricting the arts.
First, subsidizing the arts is neither a proper nor necessary job for government. Although public health is generally viewed as critical to a societys very survival and therefore an appropriate concern of government, this concern should not extend tenuously to our cultural health or well-being. A lack of private funding might justify an exception: in my observation; however, philanthropy is alive and well today, especially among the new technology and media moguls.
Second, government cannot possibly play an evenhanded role as arts patron. Inadequate resources call for restrictions; priorities, and choices, it is unconscionable to relegate normative decisions as to which art has value to a few legislators and jurists, who may be unenlightened in their notions about art. Also, legislators are all too likely to make choices in favor of the cultural agendas of those lobbyists with the most money and influence.
Third, restricting artistic expression may in some cases encroach upon the constitutional right of free expression. In any case, governmental restriction may chill creativity, thereby defeating the very purpose of subsidizing the arts.
In the final analysis, government cannot philosophically or economically justify its involvement in the arts, either by subsidy or sanction. Responsibility lies with individuals to determine what art has value and to support that art.
上一篇: GMAT issue提纲(五)
下一篇: GMAT issue提纲(十八)
体坛英语资讯:Over 100,000 people apply to be London 2012 volunteers
体坛英语资讯:Arsenal, Chelsea keep perfect record; Bayern, Real also win again
体坛英语资讯:Estonia stuns Serbia 3-1 in Euro 2012 qualifying
体坛英语资讯:Germany, Netherlands seal wins in Euro 2012 qualifying
体坛英语资讯:Former NBA all-star Francis arrested
体坛英语资讯:Forlan refuses to rule out move
体坛英语资讯:Brianti crowned at international womens tennis challenge
体坛英语资讯:Contador stresses innocence over dope test
体坛英语资讯:Uganda renders big reward to double Commonwealth gold winner Kipsiro
体坛英语资讯:Zico leaves Flamengo, stirs crisis
体坛英语资讯:Olympic Park to be renamed after Queen Elizabeth in 2013
体坛英语资讯:Barcelona beat Lakers in NBA European tour
体坛英语资讯:Petrova romps past local wildcard in China Open first round
体坛英语资讯:Brazil retain title with easy win over Cuba
体坛英语资讯:Badminton world No. 1 Lee Chong Wei reaches semis at Comm Games
体坛英语资讯:Soderling, Davydenko reach second round at China Open
体坛英语资讯:Kuerten confirms tennis match against Agassi
体坛英语资讯:Bayern extend contract with Louis van Gaal
体坛英语资讯:Buffon expects to return in January
体坛英语资讯:Injuries affect Del Bosque plans
体坛英语资讯:Palmeiras beats Internacional 2-0
体坛英语资讯:Clijsters withdraws from China Open
体坛英语资讯:Nadal claims Japan Open tennis title
体坛英语资讯:United held to goalless at Sunderland
体坛英语资讯:Cruzeiro, Atletico-PR draw 0-0 in Brazilian soccer
体坛英语资讯:Cruzeiro beats Fluminense 1-0, assumes leadership
体坛英语资讯:Guangzhou Asian Games flame lit at Great Wall
体坛英语资讯:Vasco da Gama defeats Goias 3-2 in comeback win
体坛英语资讯:Michael Ballack postpones comeback
体坛英语资讯:Atletico-PR beat Vitoria 1-0