All groups and organizations should function as teams in which everyone makes decisions and shares responsibilities and duties. Giving one person central authority and responsibility for a project or task is not an effective way to get work done。 To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above? Support your views with reasons and/or specific examples drawn from your own work or school experiences, your observations, or your reading。
Some people argue that it is not an effective way to give one person central authority and responsibility to get work done. Rather, all groups and organizations should function as teams where everyone makes decisions and shares responsibilities. Although it is true that doing things in team-based environment creates a cooperation spirit which is a powerful motivator for the workers of the company, I still believe that there should be someone who makes decision and share duties。
First, a group cannot make decisions. Everyone in a group can bring out suggestions, pros and cons, but only one person can make the final decision and bear the major responsibility for a project or task. This brings my second point that responsibility has to be personal to mean something. Group responsibility means nothing. Another point is that a required step in any large project is to divide the project into smaller parts and to assign them to the team members. Naturally, only a chief person can do that。
Second, most people agree that they are motivated when they are assigned to authorize and bear responsibility for a project or task. If the responsibility is handled by a single individual, there is a high degree of accountability because that person is completely responsible for his actions. Furthermore, projects that require quick response time and intuition should be done by individuals. In this case, there is no time to call a meeting and come to a group discussion on what to do next。
In conclusion, although team work is a necessity in any organization, it is best when it is done in the presences of several decision making executives, whom will make the decisions, after consulting with their teams, assign tasks, and carry the responsibility。
上一篇: GMAT优秀范文推荐:谈收入
下一篇: GMAT写作黄金80题(18)
体坛英语资讯:Drogba likely to start against Brazil
跟小动物有关的情绪表达
体坛英语资讯:World No. 1 Nadal eases into second round at Wimbledon
体坛英语资讯:Schweinsteiger and Boateng doubtful for England match
体坛英语资讯:Netherlands beat Cameroon 2-1 to top Group E
体坛英语资讯:I take all responsibility, says Lippi
体坛英语资讯:World Cup Group E: Denmark vs Cameroon 2-1
体坛英语资讯:Germany, Ghana join England, U.S. in last 16
体坛英语资讯:Serbia, Australia out in dignity in World Cup
体坛英语资讯:Opener losers meet for last match of second round group stage
体坛英语资讯:FIFA vows to tighten security following England fan breach
体坛英语资讯:Italy crash out, Japan through to second round
体坛英语资讯:Argentina into last 16 of World Cup
体坛英语资讯:England held goalless draw with Algeria in World Cup
体坛英语资讯:Bayer Leverkusen signs Michael Ballack
体坛英语资讯:French media lambast Les Bleus without scoring in 2010 World Cup
体坛英语资讯:Brazil becomes 2nd squad of top 16, slashing Cote dIvoire 3-1
体坛英语资讯:Slovakia not bold enough against Paraguay: coach Weiss
2017考研:英语高频短语(17)
双语阅读婚姻保鲜小秘籍
体坛英语资讯:Messi to captain Argentina against Greece, report
体坛英语资讯:Gerrard salutes Englands fighting spirit
体坛英语资讯:Venus reaches Wimbledon fourth round
体坛英语资讯:Coach Capello admits pressure affecting England in World Cup
2017考研:英语高频短语(18)
体坛英语资讯:World Cup favorites Netherlands edge Japan 1-0 in Group E
体坛英语资讯:Brazil down Cote dIvoire, New Zealand hold Italy
体坛英语资讯:Spain wakes up to beat Honduras 2-0
体坛英语资讯:Group winners face each other, hoping for earlier entry of last 16
体坛英语资讯:Maradona could make seven changes to Argentine squad