The conclusion in this argument is that the state legislature need not consider the views of protesting students. To support this conclusion, the author points out that only 200 of the 12,000 students traveled to the state capitol to voice their concerns about proposed cuts in college programs. Since the remaining students did not take part in this protest, the author concludes they are not interested in this issue. The reasoning in this argument is flawed for two reasons.
First, the author assumes that because only one-tenth of the students took part in the protest, these students views are unrepresentative of the entire student body. This assumption is unwarranted. If it turns out, for example, that the protesting students were randomly selected from the entire student body, their views would reflect the views of the entire college. Without information regarding the way in which the protesting students were selected, it is presumptuous to conclude that their opinions fail to reflect the opinions of their colleagues.
Second, the author cites the fact that the remaining 12,000 students stayed on campus or left for winter break as evidence that they are not concerned about their education. One obvious rejoinder to this line of reasoning is that the students who did not participate did so when they that their concerns would be expressed by the protesting students. In any case, the author has failed to demonstrate a logical connection between the students alleged lack of concern and the fact that they either stayed on campus or left for winter break. Without this connection, the conclusion reached by the author that the remaining 12,000 students are not concerned about their education is unacceptable.
As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned. To make it logically acceptable, the author would have to demonstrate that the protesting students had some characteristic in common that biases their views, thereby nullifying their protest as representative of the entire college.
小编提醒:这些文章的价值不在于它们的语言表达,而在于它们提出的观点具有启发作用。考生们请不要背样文,应背写作模式及每篇的理由。
上一篇: GMAT写作常见话题整理(3)
下一篇: GMAT写作素材:黄金二十句
2017届高考英语一轮模块复习学案:模块7.1《living with technology》(原卷版)
2017届高考英语一轮模块复习学案:模块7.1《living with technology》(解析版)
2017届高考英语一轮模块复习学案:模块6.2《what is happiness to you》(解析版)
2017届高考英语一轮模块复习学案:模块7.3《the world online》(原卷版)
2017届高考英语一轮模块复习学案:模块6.2《what is happiness to you》(原卷版)
2017届高考英语一轮模块复习单元训练:模块4.2《sports events》(解析版)
2017届高考英语一轮模块复习学案:模块7.4《public transport》(解析版)
2017届高考英语一轮模块复习学案:模块8.1《the written word》(解析版)
特朗普前妻出书分享育儿经 谈如何培养优秀儿女
2017届高考英语一轮模块复习单元训练:模块5.1《getting along with others 》(解析版)
2017届高考英语一轮模块复习单元训练:模块3.3《tomorrow’s world》(原卷版)
《美女与野兽》的原型故事,原来很暗黑……
2017届高考英语一轮模块复习单元训练:模块6.4《helping people around the world》(解析版)
2017届高考英语一轮模块复习单元训练:模块4.3《tomorrow’s world》(原卷版)
2017届高考英语一轮模块复习单元训练:模块5.2《the environment》(解析版)
2017届高考英语一轮模块复习学案:模块6.1《laughter is good for you 》(原卷版)
滴滴宣布专车快车动态调价双重封顶
2017届高考英语一轮模块复习单元训练:模块5.2《the environment》(原卷版)
《欢乐喜剧人》首映礼郭德纲遭遇憨豆 中西喜剧大师对话
2017届高考英语一轮模块复习单元训练:模块3.3《tomorrow’s world》(解析版)
2017届高考英语一轮模块复习学案:模块6.3《understanding each other》(原卷版)
2017届高考英语一轮模块复习学案:模块8.3《the world of colours and light 》(解析版)
2017届高考英语一轮全册复习课时作业:必修1.1《Friendship》(新人教版含解析)
白色圣诞节 White Christmas
2017届高考英语一轮模块复习单元训练:模块6.1《laughter is good for you》(解析版)
2017届高考英语一轮模块复习学案:模块7.2《fit for life》(原卷版)
2017届高考英语一轮模块复习学案:模块8.3《the world of colours and light 》(原卷版)
2017届高考英语一轮模块复习单元训练:模块5.1《getting along with others 》(原卷版)
2017届高考英语一轮模块复习学案:模块8.4《films and film events 》(原卷版)
2017届高考英语一轮模块复习单元训练:模块6.3《understanding each other》(原卷版)