In this argument the author concludes that the Apogee Company should dose
down field offices and conduct all its operations from a single, centralized location
because the company had been more profitable in the past when all its operations were in one location. For a couple of reasons, this argument is not very convincing.
First, the author assumes that centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and streamlining supervision of employees. This assumption is never supported with any data or projections. Moreover, the assumption fails to take into account cost increases and inefficiency that could result from centralization. For instance, company representatives would have to travel to do business in areas formerly served by a field office, creating travel costs and loss of critical time. In short, this assumption must be supported with a thorough cost-benefit analysis of centralization versus other possible cost-cutting and/or profit-enhancing strategies.
Second, the only reason offered by the author is the claim that Apogee was more profitable when it had operated from a single, centralized location. But is centralization the only difference relevant to greater past profitability? It is entirely possible that management has become lax regarding any number of factors that can affect the bottom line such as inferior products, careless product pricing, inefficient production, poor employee expense account monitoring, ineffective advertising, sloppy buying policies and other wasteful spending. Unless the author can rule out other factors relevant to diminishing profits, this argument commits the fallacy of assuming that just because one event follows another , the second event has been caused by the first.
In conclusion, this is a weak argument. To strengthen the conclusion that Apogee should close field offices and centralize. This author must provide a thorough cost-benefit analysis of available alternatives and rule out factors other than decentralization that might be affecting current profits negatively.
小编提醒:这些文章的价值不在于它们的语言表达,而在于它们提出的观点具有启发作用。考生们请不要背样文,应背写作模式及每篇的理由。
上一篇: GMAT写作练习:Argument(3)
体坛英语资讯:Maradona stays on as Argentina coach
体坛英语资讯:Benzema denies charges in prostitute case
体坛英语资讯:A new name to be engraved onto World Cup trophy
体坛英语资讯:Gay beats Powell in IAAF Diamond League
体坛英语资讯:Yao Ming fears he wont be bigger, better than ever
体坛英语资讯:Spain overtakes Brazil in FIFA rankings
体坛英语资讯:Agent frustrates Brazilian clubs hopes of landing Ronaldinho
体坛英语资讯:American Bettencourt lifts Reno-Tahoe Open title
体坛英语资讯:Webber wins F1 British Grand Prix
体坛英语资讯:Paulinho wins 10th stage while Schleck keeps yellow jersey
体坛英语资讯:Cruzeiro announces signing of Argentine striker Farias
体坛英语资讯:French soccer player Ribery under judicial investigation on sex probe
体坛英语资讯:Brazilian Confederation of Soccer wants Parreira as head coach
体坛英语资讯:Uruguay joyful in welcoming World Cup national team
体坛英语资讯:Spanish soccer can continue to reign supreme in the future
体坛英语资讯:After World Cup, South African eyes Olympic bid
体坛英语资讯:Gremios loss to Gremio Prudente puts coachs job in jeopardy
体坛英语资讯:UEFA president Platini released from hospital
体坛英语资讯:South Africa to build on World Cup success
体坛英语资讯:Messi congratulates Spanish team for triumph
体坛英语资讯:Barcelona signs Brazilian player Adriano
体坛英语资讯:Portugal, Latin America congratulate Spains triumph at World Cup
体坛英语资讯:Robles to hunt for London gold
体坛英语资讯:NBA Warriors sold for $450 mln: report
体坛英语资讯:Serbia, Argentina complete Davis Cup last four
体坛英语资讯:German football coach Loew undecided over contract extension
体坛英语资讯:Australian Mark Renshaw kicked off Tour de France for headbutting
体坛英语资讯:Ronaldo admits not ready to play
体坛英语资讯:World Cup final pitch invader to appear in court
体坛英语资讯:German head coach Joachim Loew extends contract