为了方便广大考生更好的复习,综合整理了备考资料:GMAT优秀作文精选,以供各位考生考试复习参考,希望对考生复习有所帮助。
The author of this article warns that stronger laws are needed to protect new kinds of home security systems from being copied and sold by imitators in order to prevent an eventual loss of manufacturing jobs within the industry. This conclusion is based on the following chain of reasoning: With the protection of stronger laws, manufacturers will naturallyinvest in the development of new home security products and production technologies, whereas without such protection, manufacturers will cut back on investment. If manufacturers cut back on investment, then a decline in product quality and marketability, as well as in production efficiency, will result. This, in turn, will cause the predicted loss of industry jobs. This line of reasoning is unconvincing for several reasons.
To begin with, the author assumes that existing copyright, patent and trade secret laws are inadequate to protect home security system design. But the author never explains why these laws dont offer sufficient protection, nor does he offer any evidence to show that this is the case.
Secondly, the argument depends on the twin assumptions that stronger legal protection will encourage manufacturers to invest in home security-system production, while the absence of strong legal protection will have the opposite effect. The author fails to provide any evidence or reasons for accepting these assumptions about cause-and-effect connections between the law and what happens in the marketplace.
Moreover, both of these assumptions can be challenged. It is possible that stronger protections would not greatly affect industry investment or jobs overall, but would instead help to determine which companies invested heavily and, therefore, provided the jobs. For instance, a less-restricted market might foster investment and competition among smaller companies, whereas stronger legal protections might encourage market domination by fewer, larger companies.
In conclusion, I do not find this argument compelling. The author must provide evidence that home security system designs are not being adequately, protected by current patent, copyright or trade secret laws. The author must also provide an argument for the assumptions that stronger laws will create more industry jobs overall, while the absence of stronger laws will result in fewer industry jobs.
小编提醒:考生们可在日常生活中多读范文,多练笔,培养出好的语感和逻辑,这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。
上一篇: 备考资料:GMAT优秀作文精选(207)
下一篇: 备考资料:GMAT优秀作文精选(196)
国际英语资讯:Sudans ruling council, armed groups closer to reaching peace deal
体坛英语资讯:Berlin tie Bayern 2-2 in Bundesliga season opener
体坛英语资讯:Gasquet advances into first Cincinnati semi
你的极限在哪?开发你无限潜力的9个问题
每天都是一首歌
上班族妈咪致格温妮丝的公开信
巴基斯坦9月大男孩被控谋杀 终交保获释
莎士比亚——赞誉与质疑并存
美翻了:哥斯达黎加间歇火山喷花瓣雨
体坛英语资讯:Depay, Dembele lead Lyons six-goal rout of Angers in Ligue 1
国内英语资讯:Senior CPC official calls for contribution to mutual learning and benefit between China and
国际英语资讯:Israeli PMs annexation plan draws condemnation from Palestinian, Arab leaders
中国药科大学用人脸识别考勤引争议
英国好老板:给员工放假看《权力的游戏》
国际英语资讯:Trump approval rating drops as expectations for recession, China trade concerns grow
国内英语资讯:Economic Watch: China lifts investment quota limit for QFII, RQFII amid financial opening-up
现如今北京全球化程度已超华盛顿
似乎永不休止的感冒 为什么一直不见好转
国际英语资讯:Italys new govt survives final parliament challenge; 2020 budget debate awaits
乔治王子不愁“找老婆”