当然,每个人情况不一样,我个人本来英语不错,女朋友又是纯美国人,所以有些优势,但是我觉得我上面说得大方向没有错。另外附上我的模板供大家参考
In this argument, the arguer concludes/claims that. The author cites..as an example in support of his recommendation. Furthermore, he also assume that.At first glance, the authors argument appears to be somewhat appealing, but thorough examination reveals that the argument is problematic because of several critical flaws that are discussed below.
Firstly, the argument rests on a gratuitous assumption that++++ However, the assumption is questionable because the author provides no evidence to support it. The arguer fails to take into account other factors that might contribute to the result that++++It is likely that++++++It is also likely that ++++. Any of thee scenarios, if true, would show that++++. Therefore, this argument in question should not to be accepted without ruling out such possibility that++++++
Secondly, the argument commits the logical fallacy of after this, therefore because of this. In no case can the mere fact that +++++ be cited as evidence to support the assumption that there is a causal-effect relationship between A and B. Moreover, that just because B can be statistically correlated with A doesnt necessarily mean that A is the cause of B. In fact, the author has obviously neglected the possibility of other alternative factors such as++++, or +++ that may contribute to a certain extent of B. It may be only a coincidence that+++++. Unless the author can rule out other factors relevant to+++++, this assumption in question cant be accepted.
Thirdly, the argument has also committed the fallacy of false analogy. The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all aspects, and the author assumes without justification that all things are equal, and that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. No evidence is provided to support this assumption. However, there are all kinds of important differences between +++ and +++, making the analogy less than valid. For example, A++++, however, B++++. Thus lacking this assumption, the conclusion is entirely unfounded.
Fourthly, the evidence that the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is rarely sufficient to establish a general conclusion. Unless the arguer can show that A1 is representative of all A, the conclusion that ++++ is completely unwarranted. In fact, in face of such limited evidence, it is fallacious to draw any conclusion at all.
Last but not least, the validity of the survey on which the argument relies is dubious in itself. The survey cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim doesnt indicate who conducted the survey and when and how the survey is conducted, neither does it mention the sample size, or how the samples are selected. Until these questions are answered, the results of this survey are worthless as evidence to support that+++++
上一篇: GMAT考试issue范文提纲(11)
下一篇: GMAT考试issue范文提纲(7)
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第62课:What’s the matter with them?
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第57课:An unusual day很不平常的一天
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第83课:Going on holiday度假
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第100课:He says that...
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第77课:Terrible toothache要命的牙痛
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第79课:Carol’s shopping list卡罗尔的购物单
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第60课:What’s the time?
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第55课:The Sawyer family索耶一家人
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第95课:Tickets,please请把车票拿出来
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第84课:Have you had...?
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第90课:Have you... yet?
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第92课:When will....?
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第59课:Is that all?就这些吗?
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第56课:What do they usually do?
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第61课:A bad cold重感冒
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第65课:Not a baby不是一个孩子
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第68课:What’s the time?
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第75课:Uncomfortable shoes不舒适的鞋子
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第91课:Poor Ian可怜的伊恩
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第96课:What’s the exat time?
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第94课:Will you go to...?
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第98课:Whose is it?
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第88课:Have you ...yet?
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第87课:A car crash车祸
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第82课:I had...
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第74课:What did they do?
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第101课:A card from Jimmy吉米的明信片
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第89课:For sale待售
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第78课:When did you...
新概念英语第一册视频讲解 第70课:When were they there?