编辑点评: GRE的写作部分是不少考生头疼的部分,不仅考察考生的英语能力更是考察学生的逻辑与思维能力。多阅读优质范文无疑对GRE写作有很大的帮助。本系列为大家挑选了ISSUE部分的优质范文。
Most people would agree that buildings represent a valuable record of any society s past, but controversy arises when old buildings stand on the ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purpose. In such situation, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings so that comtemporary needs can be served;
The speaker asserts that wherever a practical, utilitarian need for new buildings arises this need should take precedence over our conflictiong interest in preserving historic buildings as a record of our past. In my view, however, which interest should take precedence should be determined on a cast-by-cast basis-and should account not only for practical and historic consideration but also aethetic ones.
In determing whether to raze an older building, planners should of course consider tht community s current and anticipated utilitarain needs. For example, if an additional hospital is needed to adequately serve the health-care needs of a fast-growing community, this compelling interest might very well outweigh any interest in preserving a historic building that sits on the proposed site. Or if additional parking is needed to ensure the economic servival of a city s downtown district, this interest might take precedence over the historic value of an old structure that stands in the way of a parking structure. On the other hand, if the need is mainly for more office space, in some cases an architecturally appropriate add-on or annex to an older building might serve just as well as razing the old building to make way for a new one. Of course, an expensive retrofit might not be worthwhile if no amount of retrofitting would meet the need.
Competing with a community s utilitarian needs is an interest preserving the historical record. Again, the weight of this interest should be determined on a case-by-case basis. Perhaps an older building uniquely represents a bygone area, or once played a central role in the city s history as a municipal structure. Or perhaps the building once served as the home of a founding family or other significant historical figure, or as the location of an important historical event. Any of these scenarios might justify saving the building at the expense of the practical needs of the community. On the other hand, if several older buildings represent the same historical era just as effectively, or if the building s history is an unremarkable one, then the historic value of the building might pale in comparison to the value of a new structure that meets a compelling practical need.
Also competing with a community s utilitarian needs is the aesthetic and architectural value of the building itself-apart from historical events with which it might be associated. A building might be one of only a few that represents a certain architectural style. Or it might be especially beautiful, perhaps as a result of the craftsmanship and materials employed in its construction-which might be cost-prohibitive to replicate today. Even retrofitting the building to accommodate current needs might undermine its aesthetic as well as historic value, by altering its appearance and architectural integrity. Of course it is planners should strive to account for aesthetic value nonetheless.
In sum, whether to raze an older building in order to construct a new one should never be determined indiscriminately. Instead, planners should make such decision on a case-by-case basis, weighing the community s practical needs against the building s historic and aesthetic value.
上一篇: GRE issue写作范文:复杂与简单
国际英语资讯:Botswanans brave hot weather to vote in general elections
2017年12月英语四级作文范文:大学里的宿舍生活
国际英语资讯:Libya starts voter registration for 2018 elections
川普总统将宣布美国承认耶路撒冷为以色列首都
体坛英语资讯:Barca, Atletico with different needs in Tuesdays Champions League ties
Shipwreck finds earliest astrolabe 沉船中发现世上最早航海星盘
中纪委推出八项规定表情包
2017年12月英语四级考前预测高分范文3篇
体坛英语资讯:Chinas Shi Tingmao awarded FINA Best Female Diver of the Year 2017
霉霉登上英国版Vogue杂志,还为粉丝写了诗!
养狗能降低病人的死亡概率
体坛英语资讯:Sun Yang awarded for outstanding contribution to swimming in China
My Mother’s Food 妈妈做的菜
中国人口流动的决定因素
国内英语资讯:Chinese premier meets top EU diplomat
国内英语资讯:China, Philippines to further develop bilateral relations
小测验 - 英语中常用的连词
国际英语资讯:UN concludes environmental assembly with pledges to end pollution
国际英语资讯:Violent clashes in Athens on anniversary of students killing by police
国际英语资讯:Japans trade minister resigns amid election law violation scandal
To Be a Good Talker and Listener 成为一个好的谈话者和聆听者
面相学小课堂:脸长的男人智商高?大鼻子代表有野心?
国内英语资讯:Fifth C919 jet completes maiden test flight
2017年12月英语六级作文范文:移民
国内英语资讯:China to further promote government information sharing and disclosure
国际英语资讯:Japan, S. Korea rift continues as little headway made in prime ministers talks
国内英语资讯:Xi promises wider opening-up as Fortune forum opens
空气污染让人郁闷还让人笨?
Dont Lose Heart 不要灰心
国内英语资讯:Top legislator stresses closer ties between lawmakers, people