To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
Whether successful leadership requires that a leader follow high ethical and moral standards is a complex issue--one that is fraught with the problems of defining ethics, morality, and successful leadership in the first place. In addressing the issue it is helpful to consider in turn three distinct forms of leadership: business, political, and social-spiritual.
In the business realm, successful leadership is generally defined as that which achieves the goal of profit maximization for a firms shareholders or other owners. Moreover, the prevailing view in Western corporate culture is that by maximizing profits a business leader fulfills his or her highest moral or ethical obligation. Many disagree, however, that these two obligations are the same. Some detractors claim, for example, that business leaders have a duty to do no intentional harm to their customers or to the society in which they operate--for example, by providing safe products and by implementing pollution control measures. Other detractors go further--to impose on business leaders an affirmative obligation to protect consumers, preserve the natural environment, promote education, and otherwise take steps to help alleviate societys problems.
Whether our most successful business leaders are the ones who embrace these additional obligations depends, of course, on ones own definition of business success. In my observation, as business leaders become subject to closer scrutiny by the media and by social activists, business leaders will maximize profits in the long term only by taking reasonable steps to minimize the social and environmental harm their businesses cause. This observation also accords with my personal view of a business leaders ethical and moral obligation.
In the political realm the issue is no less complex. Definitions of successful political leadership and of ethical or moral leadership are tied up in the means a leader uses to wield his or her power and to obtain that power in the first place. One useful approach is to draw a distinction between personal morality and public morality. In my observation personal morality is unrelated to effective political leadership. Modern politics is replete with examples of what most people would consider personal ethical failings: the marital indiscretions of President Kennedy, for instance. Yet few would disagree that these personal moral choices adversely affected his ability to lead.
In contrast, pubhc morality and successful leadership are more closely connected. Consider the many leaders, such as Stalin and Hitler, whom most people would agree were egregious violators of public morality. Ultimately such leaders forfeit their leadership as a result of the immoral means by which they obtained or wielded their power. Or consider less egregious examples such as President Nixon, whose contempt for the very legal system that afforded him his leadership led to his forfeiture of it. It seems that in the short term unethical public
behavior might serve a political leaders interest in preserving his or her power; yet in the long term such behavior invariably results in that leaders down- fall that is, in failure.
One must also consider a third type of leadership: social-spiritual. Consider notable figures such as Gandhi and Martin Luther King, whom few would disagree were eminently successful in leading others to practice the high ethical and moral standards which they advocated. However, I would be hard-pressed to name one successful social or spiritual leader whose leadership was predicated on the advocacy of patently unethical or immoral behavior. The reason for this is simple: high standards for ones own public morality are prerequisites for successful social-spiritual leadership.
In sum, history informs us that effective political and social-spiritual leadership requires adherence to high standards of public morality. However, when it comes to business leadership the relationship is less clear; successful business leaders must strike a balance between achieving profit maximization and fulfilling their broader obligation to the society, which comes with the burden of such leadership.
上一篇: GRE写作备考技巧
下一篇: GRE作文北美范文:科技提高人们生活品质
青少年睡眠不足的危害
除了“熬夜党”和“早起鸟”,其实还有一种人是“午睡派”
Playing Ping-pong 打乒乓球
The Balance Between Study and Amusement 学习与娱乐之间的平衡
国内英语资讯:China to improve peoples livelihood with intensified efforts
穿紧身裤也有罪?美国母亲遭网友反击
国际英语资讯:Rwanda looks to first China-Africa trade expo to advance local products
国际英语资讯:Venezuelas Supreme Court seeks to strip Guaido of parliamentary immunity
求职者看过来!破解最常见的五个面试问题
国际英语资讯:Interview: China-Africa expo to boost economic and trade ties
My Secret 我的秘密
国际英语资讯:U.S. envoy says Washington seeks new deal with Tehran
国际英语资讯:Chinese delegation follows up on Lebanons new conservatory
国内英语资讯:Chinese embassy in Manila memorizes fallen Philippine Chinese in WWII
国内英语资讯:China, New Zealand agree to deepen comprehensive strategic partnership
国际英语资讯:11 centers set up to fight cholera in Idai-hit areas of Mozambique: UN
国际英语资讯:Feature: DPRK tourism thriving among Chinese thanks to historical links
国内英语资讯:Top political advisor calls for efforts to promote China-Africa cooperation
体坛英语资讯:Alaves confirm signing of forward Lucas Perez
国内英语资讯:FM Wang Yi holds talks with Dutch counterpart
国内英语资讯:FACTBOX: Key takeaways on Belt and Road Initiative development
报告指出 短视频推动互联网增长
体坛英语资讯:China confirmed as host of AFC Asian Cup 2023
用大数据如何拯救世界?
国际英语资讯:Japan spurns request by S. Korea to hold talks on wartime labor dispute
国内英语资讯:China Focus: Rescue operation continues as death toll rises to 13 in China earthquake
整容客户低龄化 元凶竟是自拍?
联合国:2100年全球人口将达到109亿
体坛英语资讯:Bayern confirm signing France defender Hernandez
哪些瓜果的皮能吃,但没人知道?