gre argument63提纲分析汇总-查字典英语网
搜索1
所在位置: 查字典英语网 >留学英语 > GRE > GRE写作 > gre argument63提纲分析汇总

gre argument63提纲分析汇总

发布时间:2016-03-01  编辑:查字典英语网小编

  前段时间为gre考生汇总了gre issue写作提纲思路和分析,希望对考生在攻破gre issue写作上有所帮助。接下来的几天我们将为gre考生整理gre argument部分的提纲内容。希望通过我们的整理和汇总,让gre考生真正能掌握gre写作的精髓。

  题目题材:社会

  gre argument 63题目:

  When Stanley Park first opened, it was the largest, most heavily used park in town. It is still the largest park, but it is no longer heavily used. Video cameras mounted in the parks parking lots last month revealed the parks drop in popularity: the recordings showed an average of only 50 cars per day. In contrast, tiny Carlton Park in the heart of the business district is visited by more than 150 people on a typical weekday. An obvious difference is that Carlton Park, unlike Stanley Park, provides ample seating. Thus, if Stanley Park is ever to be as popular with our citizens as is Carlton Park, the town will obviously need to provide more benches, thereby converting some of the unused open areas into spaces suitable for socializing.

  提纲:

  The number of cars at the parks parking lots may not be a good indication of the parks popularity.

  There may be some special reasons last month that resulted in the dropped popularity of Stanley Park.

  The author does not provide information concerning the number of visitors at Stanley before the cameras were mounted.

  Many other differences may render the two parks not comparable.

  The author fails to convince us that it is the ample seating that makes Carlton so popular.

  The author fails to consider the possible negative effects of converting unused open areas into public social spaces.

  注:题目中括号里的数字表明这句话体现的是提纲中第几号缺陷。

  无论是gre issue还是gre argument,考生都应该养成写提纲的习惯。这种提纲式的gre写作练习可以帮助考生锻炼写作的逻辑性,而gre写作高分最重要的得分依据就是作文的逻辑性要强。

  

点击显示

推荐文章
猜你喜欢
附近的人在看
推荐阅读
拓展阅读
  • 大家都在看
  • 小编推荐
  • 猜你喜欢
  •