People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are the most critical of it.
The speaker claims that people who are the most firmly committed to an idea or policy are the same people who are most critical of that idea or policy. While I find this claim paradoxical on its face, the paradox is explainable, and the explanation is well supported empirically. Nevertheless, the claim is an unfair generalization in that it fails to account for other empirical evidence serving to discredit it.
A threshold problem with the speakers claim is that its internal logic is questionable. At first impression it would seem that firm commitment to an idea or policy necessarily requires the utmost confidence in it, and yet one cannot have a great deal of confidence in an idea or policy if one recognizes its flaws, drawbacks, or other problems. Thus commitment and criticism would seem to be mutually exclusive. But are they? One possible explanation for the paradox is that individuals most firmly committed to an idea or policy are often the same people who are most knowledgeable on the subject, and therefore are in the best position to understand and appreciate the problems with the idea or policy.
Lending credence to this explanation for the paradoxical nature of the speakers claim are the many historical cases of uneasy marriages between commitment to and criticism of the same idea or policy. For example, Edward Teller, the so-called father of the atom bomb, was firmly committed to Americas policy of gaining military superiority over the Japanese and the Germans; yet at the same time he attempted fervently to dissuade the U.S. military from employing his technology for destruction, while becoming the most visible advocate for various peaceful and productive applications of atomic energy. Another example is George Washington, who was quoted as saying that all the worlds denizens should abhor war wherever they may find it. Yet this was the same military general who played a key role in the Revolutionary War between Britain and the States. A third example was Einstein, who while committed to the mathematical soundness of his theories about relativity could not reconcile them with the equally compelling quantum theory which emerged later in Einsteins life. In fact, Einstein spent the last twenty years of his life criticizing his own theories and struggling to determine how to reconcile them with newer theories.
In the face of historical examples supporting the speakers claim are innumerable influential individuals who were zealously committed to certain ideas and policies but who were not critical of them, at least not outwardly. Could anyone honestly claim, for instance, that Elizabeth Stanton and Susan B. Anthony, who in the late 19th Century paved the way for the womens rights movement by way of their fervent advocacy, were at the same time highly critical or suspicious of the notion that women deserve equal rights under the law? Also, would it not be absurd to claim that Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King, historys two leading advocates of civil disobedience as a means to social reform, had serious doubts about the ideals to which they were so demonstrably committed? Finally, consider the two ideologues and revolutionaries Lenin and Mussolini. Is it even plausible that their demonstrated commitment to their own Communist and Fascist policies, respectively, belied some deep personal suspicion about the merits of these policies? To my knowledge no private writing of any of these historical figures lends any support to the claim that these leaders were particularly critical of their own ideas or policies.
To sum up, while at first glance a deep commitment to and incisive criticism of the same idea or policy would seem mutually exclusive, it appears they are not. Thus the speakers claim has some merit. Nevertheless, for every historical case supporting the speakers claim are many others serving to refute it. In the final analysis, then, the correctness of the speakers assertion must be determined on a case-by-case basis.
上一篇: GRE作文考试入门和进阶提高攻略(9)
下一篇: GRE作文考试入门和进阶提高攻略(8)
国内英语资讯:China makes headway in handling petitions this year
体坛英语资讯:China lose 86-74 to end International Basketball Challenge
国际英语资讯:Yemen Houthi rebels attack airport, power plant in Saudi Arabia
新研究:狗的无辜眼神可能是专门进化来勾引人类的
研究人员称,电子游戏有益于孩子的大脑
俄罗斯立法禁止养熊等猛兽做宠物
时装设计师建议:衣服能不洗就不洗
国际英语资讯:Interview: New Greek govt needs to give boost to reforms, investment to accelerate growth:
父亲节英语祝福语
双语文章:福特的雄心壮志
国际英语资讯:Britains Labour Party to back new EU vote in major policy shift
老爸也收花:最适合送给父亲的花
失业时回答讨厌问题的9个技巧
图像识别、小程序……高科技助力中国垃圾分类
体坛英语资讯:Federer beat Goffin to lift 10th Halle title
国际英语资讯:British PM says ambassador who critisized Trump has her full support
为什么我没有相信她?
潜意识好神奇 可预测歌曲是否会走红
体坛英语资讯:Sweden, Italy ready for final sprint of 2026 Winter Olympics
施瓦辛格情人:儿子得知生父后觉得“太酷”
The Class of Online Games 网络游戏课程
国际英语资讯:Aussie aerial shooting targets major feral animal threat in northern areas
温哥华冰球球迷骚动 情侣于暴乱中当街甜蜜拥吻
青春期肥胖危害大 或埋下癌症祸根
健康应用数据为研究员带来机遇和障碍
超半数美国人因钱不够而失眠
英公布护士着装标准 严禁低胸露脐装
国际英语资讯:UN Security Council holds open debate on intl terrorism, organized crime linkage
英国白领把同事当做首选倾诉对象
LV做了个微信小程序,想"教育"你多花点钱