Both parents and communities must be involved in the local schools. Education is too important to leave solely to a group of professional educators.
Should parents and communities participate in local education because education is too important to leave to professional educators, as the speaker asserts? It might be tempting to agree with the speaker, based on a parents legal authority over, familiarity with, and interest in his or her own children. However, a far more compelling argument can be made that, except for major decisions such as choice of school, a childs education is best left to professional educators.
Communities of parents concerned about their childrens education rely on three arguments for active parental and community participation in that process. The first argument, and the one expressed most often and vociferously, is that parents hold the ultimately legal authority to make key decisions about what and how their own children learn including choice of curriculum and text books, pace and schedule for learning, and the extent to which their child should learn alongside other children. The second argument is that only a parent can truly know the unique needs of a child including what educational choices are best suited for the child. The third argument is that parents are more motivated--by pride and ego--than any other person to take whatever measures are needed to ensure their children receive the best possible education.
Careful examination of these three arguments, however, reveals that they are specious at best. As for the first one, were we to allow parents the right to make all major decisions regarding the education of their children, many children would go with little or no education. In a perfect world parents would always make their childrens education one of their highest priorities. Yet, in fact many parents do not. As for the second argument, parents are not necessarily best equipped to know what is best for their child when it comes to education. Although most parents might think they are sufficiently expert by virtue of having gone through formal education themselves, parents lack the specialized training to appreciate what pedagogical methods are most effective, what constitutes a balanced education, how developmental psychology affects a childs capacity for learning at different levels and at different stages of childhood. Professional educators, by virtue of their specialized training in these areas, are far better able to ensure that a child receives a balanced, properly paced education.
There are two additional compelling arguments against the speakers contention. First, parents are too subjective to always know what is truly best for their children. For example, many parents try to overcome their own shortcomings and failed self-expectations vicariously through their childrens accomplishments. Most of us have known parents who push their child to excel in certain areas--to the emotional and psychological detriment of the child. Secondly, if too many parties become involved in making decisions about day-to-day instruction, the end result might be infighting, legal battles, boycotts, and other protests, all of which impede the educational process; and the ultimate victims are the children themselves. Finally, in many jurisdictions parents now have the option of schooling their children at home, as long as certain state requirements are met. In my observation, home schooling allows parents who prefer it great control over a childs education, while allowing the professional educators to discharge their responsibilities as effectively as possible--unfettered by gadfly parents who constantly interfere and intervene.
In sum, while parents might seem better able and better motivated to make key decisions about their childs education, in many cases they are not. With the possible exceptions of responsible home-schoolers, a childs intellectual, social, and psychological development is at risk when communities of parents dominate the decision-making process involving education.
上一篇: GRE作文考试入门和进阶提高攻略(8)
下一篇: GRE写作常用的表达札记
2017年高考英语试题分项版解析Ⅰ专题06 动词的时态和语态(教师版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习方案精品课件:第24讲 Unit1《The written word》(牛津译林版选修7)
2017年高考英语试题分项版解析Ⅰ专题07 情态动词和虚拟语气(教师版)
2017年高考英语试题分项版解析Ⅱ专题02 夹叙夹议完形填空(教师版)
河北省2011届英语高考复习指导:“雷人”单项选择题50例
2017年高考英语试题分项版解析Ⅰ专题04 形容词和副词(教师版)
2017年高考英语试题分项版解析Ⅰ专题06 动词的时态和语态(学生版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习方案精品课件:第8讲 Unit 2《Wish you were here》(牛津译林版必修3)
河北省2011届英语高考复习指导:常见的英语同义词50组(上)
河北省2011届高考英语复习指导:弄清定状语 读懂长短句
2017届高考英语一轮复习方案精品课件:第11讲 Unit 2《Sports events》(牛津译林版必修4)
河北省2011届英语高考复习指导:常见的英语同义词50组(下)
2017年高考英语试题分项版解析Ⅰ专题01 冠词、名词和主谓一致(教师版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习方案精品课件:第9讲 Unit 3《Back to the past》(牛津译林版必修3)
2017年高考英语试题分项版解析Ⅰ专题03 介词和介词短语(学生版)
2017年高考英语试题分项版解析Ⅰ专题09 定语从句(教师版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习方案精品课件:第20讲 Unit 20《New Frontiers》(北师大版必修7)
2017届高考英语一轮复习方案精品课件:第19讲 Unit 19《Language》(北师大版必修7)
2017年高考英语试题分项版解析Ⅱ专题01 记叙文完形填空(教师版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习方案精品课件:第19讲 Unit1《Helping people around the world》(牛津译林版必修6)
2017年高考英语试题分项版解析Ⅰ专题02 代词(学生版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习方案精品课件:第7讲 Unit1《The world of our senses》(牛津译林版必修3)
2017届高考英语一轮复习方案精品课件:第6讲 Unit 3《Amazing people》(牛津译林版必修2)
2017届高考英语一轮复习方案精品课件:第13讲 Unit 1《Getting along with others》(牛津译林版必修5)
2017届高考英语一轮复习方案精品课件:第15讲 Unit 3《Science and nature》(牛津译林版必修5)
2017年高考英语试题分项版解析Ⅰ专题12 特殊句式(教师版)
2017年高考英语试题分项版解析Ⅰ专题02 代词(教师版)
2017年高考英语试题分项版解析Ⅰ专题08 非谓语动词(教师版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习方案精品课件:第5讲 Unit 2《Wish you were here》(牛津译林版必修2)
2017届高考英语一轮复习方案精品课件:第16讲 Unit 1《Laughter is good for you》(牛津译林版必修6)