In summary, the conclusion reached in this argument is in valid and misleading. To make the argument more convincing, the arguer would have to prove that college-bound students are most concerned about the promise of jobs after graduation and the F College can keep its promise in the end. Moreover, I would suspend my judgment about the credibility of the recommendation until the arguer can provide concrete evidence that promising students jobs can actually encourage them to work harder in their study. Otherwise, the arguer is simply begging the question throughout the argument.
To conclude, the argument is not persuasive as it stands. Before we accept the conclusion, the arguer must present more facts that GT has indeed to meet the requirements of C Corporation. To solidify the argument, the arguer would have to produce more evidence concerning the foods and service of D and how they can better meet the needs of Cs employees.
As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned. To make it logically acceptable, the arguer would have to demonstrate that an offer of employment to the spouse is the only condition that new professors consider on accepting Ps offer. Additionally, the arguer must provide evidence to rule out other possible causes of the low staff morale at the university.
To sum up, the conclusion lacks credibility because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer maintains. To strengthen the argument the arguer would have to provide more evidence concerning the percentage of the affected families and their geographical distribution. To better evaluate the argument, we would need more information regarding the electric expense relevant to the actual amount of time for cooling among, respectively, the three groups of households and the amount of electricity used for other purposes in all three groups of families under survey.
In conclusion, the arguer fails to establish a causal relationship between sending Get-Aways mechanics to the Quality-Care Seminar and improved maintenance, greater customer satisfaction and greater profits for the airline. To strengthen the argument, the argument, the arguer would have to provide evidence that automobile maintenance and airplane maintenance are similar in every aspect. To better evaluate the argument, we would need more information about the relationship between improved maintenance and greater customer satisfaction along with greater profits.
新目标英语八年级上教学笔记
人教新目标版英语八上《Unit 10 I’m going to be a basketball player》word说课教案
2012新人教版八上《Unit9 When was he born》word教案
英语学科八年级上期末复习资料
2012新人教版八上《Unit 10 I’m going to be a basketball player》word教案
人教新目标版英语八上《Unit 1 How often do you exercise》word教案
人教新目标版英语八上《Unit 8 How was your school trip》word学案4篇
2012新目标(Go for it)版初中英语八年级上册全册教案
人教新目标版英语八上《Unit 3 What are you doing for vacation》word教案
人教新目标版英语八上《Unit 12 What’s the best radio station A1》word教案
2012新人教版八上《Unit 10 I m going to be a basketball player》word教案(6课时)
人教版[2013版]英语八上Unit 1《Where did you go on vacation》(SectionA 1a-1c)word导学案
人教新目标版英语八上《Unit 7 How do you make a banana milk shake》word学案2篇
人教新目标版英语八上《Unit 3 What are you doing for vacation》word学案3篇
人教新目标版英语八上《Unit 12 What’s the best radio station A2》word教案
人教新目标版英语八上《Unit 12 What’s the best radio station B2》word教案
人教新目标版英语八上《Unit 6 I’m more outgoing than my sisiter》word说课教案
人教版[2013版]英语八上Unit 10《If you go to the party》word教案
人教版[2013版]英语八上Unit 10《If you go to the party》word导学案
新目标(Go for it)版初中英语八年级上册全册教案-Units 5-6学案
人教新目标版英语八上《Unit 2 What’s the matter》word教案
人教新目标版英语八上《Unit 10 I’m going to be a basketball player》word复习教案
人教新目标版英语八上《Unit 4 How do you get to school》word学案3篇
人教新目标版英语八上《Unit 11 Could you please clean your room》word教案
人教新目标版英语八上《Unit 12 What’s the best radio station》word教案
新目标(Go for it)版初中英语八年级上册全册教案-Unit 12学案
2012新人教版八上《Unit 2 What’s the matter》word教案
人教新目标版英语八上《Unit 9 When was he born》word说课教案
人教新目标版英语八上《Unit 2 What’s the matter》word学案2篇
新目标(Go for it)版初中英语八年级上册全册教案-Unit 11学案