For the last 82years, Swedens Nobel Academy has decided who will receive the Nobel Prize in Literature, thereby determining who will be elevated from the great and the near great to the immortal. But today the Academy is coming under heavy criticism both from the without and from within.
Critics contend that the selection of the winners often has less to do with true writing ability than with the peculiar internal politics of the Academy and of Sweden itself. According to Ingmar Bjorksten, the cultural editor for one of the countrys two major newspapers, the prize continues to represent what people call a very Swedish exercise: reflecting Swedish tastes.
The Academy has defended itself against such charges of provincialism in its selection by asserting that its physical distance from the great literary capitals of the world actually serves to protect the Academy from outside influences. This may well be true, but critics respond that this very distance may also be responsible for the Academys inability to perceive accurately authentic trends in the literary world.
Regardless of concerns over the selection process, however, it seems that the prize will continue to survive both as an indicator of the literature that we most highly praise, and as an elusive goal that writers seek. If for no other reason, the prize will continue to be desirable for the financial rewards that accompany it; not only is the cash prize itself considerable, but it also dramatically increases sales of an authors books.
萌神兽来牧羊:英国农民引入羊驼保护新生羊羔
撒切尔夫人经典名言:铁娘子由内而外的强势
体坛英语资讯:Turkey coach anger over spiker Ismailoglus identification issue
研究:女性更善于做商业决策
开什么玩笑: 美国女吃货拨打911订中餐遭逮捕
跑酷爱好者挑战沱江出意外 从40米高处跳下后失踪
澳鼓励器官捐赠 在职捐赠者将获现金补偿
国内英语资讯:Chinas top legislature wraps up bimonthly session
国内英语资讯:Xi stresses efforts to improve regional economic planning, industrial chains
莫言:要想写得好,先把文学奖忘掉