职称英语综合类阅读理解练习题13

　　Looking to the Future 　　When a magazine for high-school students asked its readers what life would be like in twenty years, they said: Machines would be run by solar power. Buildings would rotate so they could follow the sun to take maximum advantage of its light and heat Walls would radiate light and change color with the push of a button. Food would be replaced by pills. School would be taught by electrical impulse while we sleep. Cars would have radar. Does this sound like the year 2000? Actually, the article was written in 1958 and the question was, what will life be like in 1978? 　　The future is much too important to simply guess about, the way the high school students did, so experts are regularly asked to predict accurately. By carefully studying the present, skilled businessmen, scientists, and politicians are supposedly able to figure out in advance what will happen. But can they? One expert on cities wrote: Cities of the future would not be crowded, but would have space for farms and fields. People would travel to work in airbuses, large all-weather helicopters carrying up to 200 passengers. When a person left the airbus station he could drive a coin-operated car equipped with radar. The radar equipment of cars would make traffic accidents almost unheard of. Does that sound familiar? If the expert had been accurate it would, because he was writing in 1957. His subject was The city of 1982. 　　If the professionals sometimes sound like high-school students, its probably because future study is still a new field. But economic forecasting, or predicting what the economy will do, has been around for a long time. It should be accurate, and generally it is. But there have been some big market in the field, too. In early 1929, most forecasters saw an excellent future for the stock market. In October of that year, the stock market had its worst losses ever, ruining thousands of investors who had put their faith in financial foreseers. 　　One forecaster knew that predictions about the future would always be subject to significant error. In 1957, H.J.Rand of the Rad corporation was asked about the year 2000, Only one thing is certain, he answered. Children born today will have reached the age of 43. 　　1. The high-school students answers to What would life be like in 1978? sound 　　A) accurate. 　　B) imaginative. 　　C) correct. 　　D) foolish. 　　2. According to the writer, forecasting is fairly accurate in 　　A) politics. 　　B) science. 　　C) sociology. 　　D) economy. 　　3. Which of the following statements is not compatible with the writers comment on future study? 　　A) Predictions should be accurate 　　B) Professional sometimes sound like high-school students 　　C) There have been some big mistakes in the field of economic forecasting. 　　D) Predictions about future would always be subject to significant errors. 　　4. The passage Looking to the Future was most probably written 　　A) in 1982 　　B) in 1958 　　C) after 1958 　　D) in 1957 　　5. H.J.Rands prediction about the year 2000 shows that 　　A) it is easy to figure out in advance what will happen 　　B) it is difficult to figure out in advance what will happen 　　C) only professionals can figure out in advance what will happen 　　D) very few professionals figure out in advance what will happen 　　KEY: BDACB 　　PASSAGE 27 　　Common Problems, Common Solutions 　　The chances are that you made up your mind about smoking a long time ago-and decided its not for you. 　　The chances are equally good that you know a lot of smokers-there are, after all about 60 millions of them, work with them, play with them, and get along with them very well. 　　And finally its a pretty safe bet that youre open-minded and interested in all the various issues about smokers and nonsmokers-or you wouldnt be reading this. 　　And those three things make you incredibly important today. 　　Because they mean that yours is the voice-not the smokers and not the anti-smokers-that will determine how much of societys efforts should go into building walls that separate us and how much into the search for solutions that bring us together. 　　For one tragic result of the emphasis on building walls is the diversion of millions of dollars from scientific research on the causes and cures of diseases which, when all is said and done, still strike the nonsmoker as well as the smoker. One prominent health organization, to cite but a single instance, now speeds 28 cents of every publicly-contributed dollar on education and only 2 cents on research. 　　There will always be some who want to build walls, who want to separate people from people, and up to a point, even these may serve society. The anti-smoking wall-builders have, to give them their due, helped to make us all more keenly aware of choice. 　　But our guess, and certainly our hope, is that you are among the far greater number who know that walls are only temporary at best, and that over the long run, we can serve societys interests better by working together in mutual accommodation. 　　Whatever virtue walls may have, they can never move our society toward fundamental solutions. People who work together on common problems, common solutions, can. 　　1. What does the word wall used in the passage mean? 　　A) Anti-smoking propaganda. 　　B) Diseases striking nonsmokers as well as smokers. 　　C) Rules and regulations that prohibit smoking 　　D) Separation of smokers from nonsmokers. 　　2. In paragraph 4, you refers to 　　A) smokers 　　B) non-smokers 　　C) anti-smokers 　　D) smokers who have quitted smoking